References: [1990] 1 EGLR 114
Coram: Nourse LJ
Ratio: Effect of mistake in notice given under the Act.
Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:
- Cited – Morrow v Nadeem ([1986] 1 WLR 1381)
In a notice served pursuant to s25 of the 1954 Act the landlord was described as the individual who was effectively the sole shareholder and director of landlord company, rather than the landlord company itself.
Held: The landlord’s notice was . .
(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:
- Cited – Lay and others v Ackerman and Another CA (Bailii, [2004] EWCA Civ 184)
Notices had been served by tenants under the Acts. The properties were on a large estate where the freeholds had been divided and assigned to different bodies, and there were inconsistencies in identifying the landlords. The landlords served a . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 14 March 2019
Ref: 214629
The post Pearson v Alyo: CA 1990 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.