References: [2012] UKUT 86 (LC)
Links: Bailii
Coram: Huskinson Judge
Ratio: UTLC LANDLORD AND TENANT – service charge – reserve funds – lease providing that reserve funds could be used to meet any temporary deficiencies in monies available for general expenditure – whether LVT should have embarked on any consideration of the question of whether monies from the reserve funds had been so spent and (if so) whether any legally sufficient reasons given for its conclusions on this point and related points (raised by LVT) under Article 1 of First Protocal of ECHR and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 – jurisdiction of LVT – whether LVT entitled to disagree with and to refuse to follow a High Court decision regarding application of s.20(B) Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 – reasonableness of service charges – costs
Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 20B, Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 05-Dec-16
Ref: 460252
The post Solitaire Property Management Company and Another v Holden and Others: UTLC 10 Apr 2012 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.